Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Metacelsus's avatar

The Mitalipov lab's mitomeiosis study is some really interesting science, but I don't think you can call these eggs functional. They have lots of abnormalities with chromosome segregation, and with the system they currently have, there's not any easy way of fixing this (because chromosome pairing depends on meiosis I, and the proteins for this aren't present in adult eggs).

Expand full comment
Hank Greely's avatar

I STRONGLY agree with Metacelsus. First I heard about the Mitalipov lab's work, I got very excited. I'm a big fan (on balance) of IVG (and wrote a book about it, The End of Sex and the Future of Human Reproduction). The experiments were cool and interesting, BUT right now they've got at least one killer problem (w/no obvious solution), another important limitation, and a possible big problem.

1. Their mitimeiosis method did reduce the chromosomes from 46 but rarely to 23, and NEVER to 1 each of 1-22 plus a sex chromosome. This is a HUGE problem. Almost all such aneuploidies will NOT be viable. And I don't see any good easy fixes for it...but this is a good lab and I'm sure they are thinking about it,.

2. Their system requires using a human egg to make a human egg. The first egg is used for cloning/somatic cell nuclear transfer, moving the genome of the person who is planned to be the genetic mother into the egg donor's egg. One of the most exciting things about IVG is the potential to avoid (expensive, unpleasant, and risky) egg harvest entirely. This fails that goal

3. The chromosomes did not recombine. Normally in meiosis, the chromosome 1s from the egg "owner's" mother and father line up and start switching bits and pieces around. Otherwise, each of your chromosomes would come entirely from one of your grandparents. Recombination, in theory, produces more genetic diversity and is good for the species (and maybe the individuals) How important would its absence be? I don't think we have any idea, And I'm not sure how could find out except by trying it in Mitalipov's mitimeiotic eggs - but NOT human ones at this point!

So, yes, I was very excited. I've been waiting nearly a decade for this kind of proof of principle. But this, alas, isn' it. (And, if you want, you can see me quoted to that effect in NPR, Stat, and Wash Post.)

Sorry!

Hank Greely

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts